Council: Not much time for the unwell
Terry Freestone and Philippa Bond make an excellent point about Ealing Council not increasing Council Tax by two per cent to cover requirements in Adult Social Welfare (which is is allowed to in spite of Central Grovernment caps).I have broken my reply to them on the other rubbish colelction-related thread where they refer to this as I think it is very important as few people reaise that many on the cuts in care and support for adults could have been avoided.Ealing Labour Group has bever had much time for the disabled or adults in need of care. It is a political group rather than a social group. The fact that Poltical Assistants are still employed and paid for by the Council while disabled care centres are closed emphasizes this situation. We have seen extra charges imposed in adult respite care and for Council Tax for the disabled and their carers (who do what they do out of love and not for money saving the state a fortune). The two percent hike in Council Tax for adult social care could have helped keep many facilities for the ill and for the disabled open. Once a leading Labour apparatchik told me that there were only two homeless in Ealing, who didn't want to live indoors, although there were already hundreds of rough sleepers in Ealing, as these people were not legal, and were not signed on, they did not exist and so were not homeless. This mentality prevails today in Ealing Labour, with the emphasis on ignoring those that are not part of the latest (Stalinist) five-year plan.
John Murias ● 3717d8 Comments ● 3676d